最近更新

目前可使用Judge Apps账号登录Wiki,并具有a:命名空间下所有页面的查看和编辑权限。

MtgTools微信小程序二维码

裁判学院(Judge Academy)相关信息集合

2019年万智节(MagicFest)日程表
2019年大中华区裁判会议

M20 核心系列2020 更新
M20套牌登记表
M20发布释疑
《摩登新篇》及《核心系列2020》CR更新

MH1 摩登新篇 更新
摩登新篇发布释疑
摩登新篇套牌登记表

用户

差别

这里会显示出您选择的修订版和当前版本之间的差别。

到此差别页面的链接

两侧同时换到之前的修订记录 前一修订版
上一修订版 两侧同时换到之后的修订记录
the_level_3_advancement_process [2014/06/03 05:29]
127.0.0.1 外部编辑
the_level_3_advancement_process [2014/08/01 03:59]
mtgjudge
行 20: 行 20:
 **Attitude and Maturity**: Regional Judges maintain a positive attitude when interacting with other members of the Magic community and demonstrate a solid and consistent work ethic. They are mature, trustworthy,​ punctual, and enjoyable to work with. They are rarely, if ever, regarded as being difficult to work with, negative, tardy, lazy, etc. A deficient judge may have a history of negativity, tardiness, poor work ethic, or reliability. He or she may display a problematically low maturity level that affects his or her performance at events. An exemplary judge is frequently sought after by fellow judges and tournament organizers for his or her exceptional attitude and contribution to events. He or she is generally regarded as a pleasure to work with. **Attitude and Maturity**: Regional Judges maintain a positive attitude when interacting with other members of the Magic community and demonstrate a solid and consistent work ethic. They are mature, trustworthy,​ punctual, and enjoyable to work with. They are rarely, if ever, regarded as being difficult to work with, negative, tardy, lazy, etc. A deficient judge may have a history of negativity, tardiness, poor work ethic, or reliability. He or she may display a problematically low maturity level that affects his or her performance at events. An exemplary judge is frequently sought after by fellow judges and tournament organizers for his or her exceptional attitude and contribution to events. He or she is generally regarded as a pleasure to work with.
  
-Self-Evaluation:​ Regional Judges are self-reflective and capable of assessing their own strengths and weaknesses. They can effectively identify areas for their own improvement beyond superficial practices such as rules knowledge, and they demonstrate insight regarding their own judge practices. A deficient judge’s self-reviews lack depth, detail, or accuracy. He or she may be unable to assess his or her own performance in meaningful ways. An exemplary judge is one who enters self-reviews into the Judge Center regularly, shows deep insight into his or her own judging practice, and is able to identify specific strategies for improvement.+**Self-Evaluation**: Regional Judges are self-reflective and capable of assessing their own strengths and weaknesses. They can effectively identify areas for their own improvement beyond superficial practices such as rules knowledge, and they demonstrate insight regarding their own judge practices. A deficient judge’s self-reviews lack depth, detail, or accuracy. He or she may be unable to assess his or her own performance in meaningful ways. An exemplary judge is one who enters self-reviews into the Judge Center regularly, shows deep insight into his or her own judging practice, and is able to identify specific strategies for improvement.
  
 **Assessment of Other Judges**: Regional Judges evaluate and formally review other judges on a regular basis. The reviews they write are professional,​ constructive,​ detailed, and helpful to the judge reviewed. Regional Judges can observe and assess a wide variety of skills, attitudes, and abilities in their fellow judges, including those of higher level. A deficient judge is one who reviews infrequently or assesses other judges very superficially. His or her reviews may lack substance, depth, and detail. The reviews may show evidence that the judge only ever assesses a very small selection of skills in other judges. An exemplary judge is a prolific reviewer, is consistently detailed in their reviews and feedback, and merges evaluation of other judges with mentorship of them seamlessly. The judge is also insightful and constructive when reviewing or critiquing judges of higher level. **Assessment of Other Judges**: Regional Judges evaluate and formally review other judges on a regular basis. The reviews they write are professional,​ constructive,​ detailed, and helpful to the judge reviewed. Regional Judges can observe and assess a wide variety of skills, attitudes, and abilities in their fellow judges, including those of higher level. A deficient judge is one who reviews infrequently or assesses other judges very superficially. His or her reviews may lack substance, depth, and detail. The reviews may show evidence that the judge only ever assesses a very small selection of skills in other judges. An exemplary judge is a prolific reviewer, is consistently detailed in their reviews and feedback, and merges evaluation of other judges with mentorship of them seamlessly. The judge is also insightful and constructive when reviewing or critiquing judges of higher level.