用户
差别
这里会显示出您选择的修订版和当前版本之间的差别。
| 两侧同时换到之前的修订记录 前一修订版 后一修订版 | 前一修订版 后一修订版 两侧同时换到之后的修订记录 | ||
|
the_level_3_advancement_process [2014/05/15 05:12] mtgjudge |
the_level_3_advancement_process [2014/06/03 05:29] 127.0.0.1 外部编辑 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| 行 2: | 行 2: | ||
| **Regional Judges** (L3s) are the leaders of premier organized play and the judge communities in their regions. They generally operate in large areas, provinces, and countries. They are recognized as regional leaders and are respected in their communities. They mentor L1s and L2s in becoming better judges. Regional Judges are expected to have a presence in their community and on mailing lists, web forums, etc. They are expected to conduct judge reviews, be Team Leaders at major events, and provide feedback on judges to the Judge Program. | **Regional Judges** (L3s) are the leaders of premier organized play and the judge communities in their regions. They generally operate in large areas, provinces, and countries. They are recognized as regional leaders and are respected in their communities. They mentor L1s and L2s in becoming better judges. Regional Judges are expected to have a presence in their community and on mailing lists, web forums, etc. They are expected to conduct judge reviews, be Team Leaders at major events, and provide feedback on judges to the Judge Program. | ||
| - | For more information about the Level 3 advancement process, visit the Testing Manager's blog. | + | For more information about the Level 3 advancement process, visit the [[http://blogs.magicjudges.org/road-to-l3/|Testing Manager's blog]]. |
| - | ====== Qualities of Regional Judges ====== | + | ===== Qualities of Regional Judges ====== |
| Regional Judges are expected to show strength in the following areas: | Regional Judges are expected to show strength in the following areas: | ||
| 行 29: | 行 29: | ||
| **Investigations**: Regional Judges can identify instances where an investigation for potential cheating, fraud, etc. is appropriate. They can ask probing questions in a timely and productive manner, and arrive at an appropriate conclusion that protects the integrity of the event and shows respect and professionalism to the parties involved. When a disqualification is warranted, Regional Judges are capable of issuing one efficiently, unapologetically, and without disruption to the rest of the event. A deficient judge does not investigate beyond the basic resolution of the situation presented during a judge call, or investigates ineffectively. The judge may take an excessive amount of time, or may arrive at decisions that are inappropriate to the situation. An exemplary judge is highly effective at investigating a player’s intentions. He or she is acutely aware of situations and cues during a judge call that indicate a need to pursue further investigation. Questioning is effective and efficient, and the judge is able to effectively assess a situation using information beyond the basic testimony of players involved (e.g. non-verbal cues, game state, player motivation, etc). | **Investigations**: Regional Judges can identify instances where an investigation for potential cheating, fraud, etc. is appropriate. They can ask probing questions in a timely and productive manner, and arrive at an appropriate conclusion that protects the integrity of the event and shows respect and professionalism to the parties involved. When a disqualification is warranted, Regional Judges are capable of issuing one efficiently, unapologetically, and without disruption to the rest of the event. A deficient judge does not investigate beyond the basic resolution of the situation presented during a judge call, or investigates ineffectively. The judge may take an excessive amount of time, or may arrive at decisions that are inappropriate to the situation. An exemplary judge is highly effective at investigating a player’s intentions. He or she is acutely aware of situations and cues during a judge call that indicate a need to pursue further investigation. Questioning is effective and efficient, and the judge is able to effectively assess a situation using information beyond the basic testimony of players involved (e.g. non-verbal cues, game state, player motivation, etc). | ||
| - | ====== The Advancement Process ====== | + | ===== The Advancement Process ====== |
| To become a Regional Judge, you will be assessed on the above qualities via a three-step process: | To become a Regional Judge, you will be assessed on the above qualities via a three-step process: | ||
| 行 36: | 行 36: | ||
| - Pre-event Interview | - Pre-event Interview | ||
| - Written Test and Panel Interview | - Written Test and Panel Interview | ||
| - | ====== Step 1: Candidacy Prerequisites ====== | + | ===== Step 1: Candidacy Prerequisites ====== |
| To be considered as a candidate for advancement to L3, you must meet all of the following requirements: | To be considered as a candidate for advancement to L3, you must meet all of the following requirements: | ||
| 行 48: | 行 48: | ||
| * Must have written a general (i.e. non-event-specific) self-review in the last 12 months, covering ALL of the Qualities of Regional Judges listed above as Strengths or Areas for Improvement. If that self-review is more than 6 months old, your application must include a brief update indicating progress on the Qualities of Regional Judges. | * Must have written a general (i.e. non-event-specific) self-review in the last 12 months, covering ALL of the Qualities of Regional Judges listed above as Strengths or Areas for Improvement. If that self-review is more than 6 months old, your application must include a brief update indicating progress on the Qualities of Regional Judges. | ||
| * Must have written at least 10 reviews in the last 12 months (certification reviews count here, self-review does not) | * Must have written at least 10 reviews in the last 12 months (certification reviews count here, self-review does not) | ||
| - | * Must include reviews of judges from both inside and outside of your region | + | * Must include reviews of judges from both inside and outside of your [[区域|region]] |
| * Must include reviews of judges of higher, equal and lower level | * Must include reviews of judges of higher, equal and lower level | ||
| * Must demonstrate the ability to point out both strengths and areas for improvement | * Must demonstrate the ability to point out both strengths and areas for improvement | ||
| * Must have received written recommendations from at least two of the following categories: | * Must have received written recommendations from at least two of the following categories: | ||
| * Your Regional Coordinator | * Your Regional Coordinator | ||
| - | * An L3+ judge within your region | + | * An L3+ judge within your [[区域|region]] |
| - | * An L3+ judge outside of your region | + | * An L3+ judge outside of your [[区域|region]] |
| * Must have received a written recommendation from an L4+ judge within the last 36 months indicating success in a Team Lead position at a Grand Prix where the recommending judge was the Head Judge | * Must have received a written recommendation from an L4+ judge within the last 36 months indicating success in a Team Lead position at a Grand Prix where the recommending judge was the Head Judge | ||
| Recommendation Requirements: | Recommendation Requirements: | ||
| 行 61: | 行 61: | ||
| * You may not begin requesting recommendations until at least one year after your L2 certification date. | * You may not begin requesting recommendations until at least one year after your L2 certification date. | ||
| * You may not begin requesting recommendations until your self-review is written and approved by the Verification Committee. | * You may not begin requesting recommendations until your self-review is written and approved by the Verification Committee. | ||
| - | While you are encouraged to keep track of your progress on the Candidacy Prerequisites as early as you deem fit, the recommendation stage of the L3 advancement process is reserved for those candidates who have been L2 for at least a year, and who have taken an active role not only in the community, but in improving their craft and investing into their own development. Before requesting recommendations, you must send a copy of your self-review to both your Regional Coordinator and l3.testing.manager@gmail.com. Once you receive notification that your self-review has been approved by the Verification Committee, you may ask for recommendations from any L3+ judge. Any request for a recommendation must include a copy of your self-review and must be cc-ed to your Regional Coordinator. | + | While you are encouraged to keep track of your progress on the Candidacy Prerequisites as early as you deem fit, the recommendation stage of the L3 advancement process is reserved for those candidates who have been L2 for at least a year, and who have taken an active role not only in the community, but in improving their craft and investing into their own development. Before requesting recommendations, you must send a copy of your self-review to both your [[区域协调员|Regional Coordinator]] and [[mailto:l3.testing.manager@gmail.com|l3.testing.manager@gmail.com]]. Once you receive notification that your self-review has been approved by the Verification Committee, you may ask for recommendations from any L3+ judge. Any request for a recommendation must include a copy of your self-review and must be cc-ed to your Regional Coordinator. |
| - | If you believe that you have met all of the Candidacy Prerequisites, send your application to both your Regional Coordinator and l3.testing.manager@gmail.com. This application must be detailed and specific; make sure that it contains explanations of the ways in which you have met each of the requirements. Your application must include: | + | If you believe that you have met all of the Candidacy Prerequisites, send your application to both your [[区域协调员|Regional Coordinator]] and [[mailto:l3.testing.manager@gmail.com|l3.testing.manager@gmail.com]]. This application must be detailed and specific; make sure that it contains explanations of the ways in which you have met each of the requirements. Your application must include: |
| * Review IDs for advancement reviews (even if you were not the certifying judge), self-review, recommendation reviews, and other relevant reviews | * Review IDs for advancement reviews (even if you were not the certifying judge), self-review, recommendation reviews, and other relevant reviews | ||
| * If your self-review is more than 6 months old, a brief update indicating progress on the Qualities of Regional Judges | * If your self-review is more than 6 months old, a brief update indicating progress on the Qualities of Regional Judges | ||
| 行 71: | 行 71: | ||
| Your application will be reviewed by the Verification Committee. | Your application will be reviewed by the Verification Committee. | ||
| - | Candidates who wish to return to L3 after an absence of no more than five years may do so via a slightly modified list of Candidacy Prerequisites. | + | Candidates who wish to return to L3 after an absence of no more than five years may do so via a [[http://wiki.magicjudges.org/en/w/Returning_L3_Candidacy_Prerequisites|slightly modified list of Candidacy Prerequisites]]. |
| - | ====== Step 2: Pre-event Interview ====== | + | ===== Step 2: Pre-event Interview ====== |
| Passing the Candidacy Prerequisites does not make you a Regional Judge. Instead, it gives you the opportunity to demonstrate your ability level in each of the Qualities of Regional Judges. | Passing the Candidacy Prerequisites does not make you a Regional Judge. Instead, it gives you the opportunity to demonstrate your ability level in each of the Qualities of Regional Judges. | ||
| 行 78: | 行 78: | ||
| In certain cases, the Judge Manager and/or Testing Manager may choose to speed up the interview process by skipping your pre-event interview and sending your answers straight to your panel lead. In such cases, the panel interview will be longer to ensure that all necessary content will be covered regardless of the format of your interview. | In certain cases, the Judge Manager and/or Testing Manager may choose to speed up the interview process by skipping your pre-event interview and sending your answers straight to your panel lead. In such cases, the panel interview will be longer to ensure that all necessary content will be covered regardless of the format of your interview. | ||
| - | ====== Step 3: Written Test and Panel Interview ====== | + | ===== Step 3: Written Test and Panel Interview ====== |
| After your pre-event interview, you will be scheduled for a written test and a panel interview, most likely at a Grand Prix event. Interviews will be scheduled based on the needs of the Judge Program and the availability of experienced judges who can act as panelists. The Judge Program will make reasonable efforts to schedule your interview in a timely manner, but does not guarantee that you will be scheduled for an interview at your next Grand Prix. In general, a Grand Prix event will have the capacity for, at most, one L3 interview. This means that you will likely not be able to request testing at a particular Grand Prix. If your Candidacy Prerequisites lapse while you are waiting to be scheduled for an interview, this fact will not be held against you. (For example, if your passing L3 Practice Test score becomes more than six months old while you wait for your interview, this will not affect your testing process.) The Judge Program will endeavor to give you at least two weeks advance notice about whether or not you will be testing at an event you attend. | After your pre-event interview, you will be scheduled for a written test and a panel interview, most likely at a Grand Prix event. Interviews will be scheduled based on the needs of the Judge Program and the availability of experienced judges who can act as panelists. The Judge Program will make reasonable efforts to schedule your interview in a timely manner, but does not guarantee that you will be scheduled for an interview at your next Grand Prix. In general, a Grand Prix event will have the capacity for, at most, one L3 interview. This means that you will likely not be able to request testing at a particular Grand Prix. If your Candidacy Prerequisites lapse while you are waiting to be scheduled for an interview, this fact will not be held against you. (For example, if your passing L3 Practice Test score becomes more than six months old while you wait for your interview, this will not affect your testing process.) The Judge Program will endeavor to give you at least two weeks advance notice about whether or not you will be testing at an event you attend. | ||