最近更新

2023.12 更新
万智牌完整规则 23.11.17
发布释疑 更新至依夏兰迷窟
套牌检查表 更新至依夏兰迷窟

用户

差别

这里会显示出您选择的修订版和当前版本之间的差别。

到此差别页面的链接

后一修订版
前一修订版
后一修订版 两侧同时换到之后的修订记录
ipg:2.1 [2017/07/03 19:01]
127.0.0.1 外部编辑
ipg:2.1 [2017/09/26 19:42]
mtgjudge
行 206: 行 206:
 最后,无论对手如何选择把异能放在什么时候,该异能会立刻结算而不使用堆叠。这是为了防止本应发生的触发被牌手响应。你肯定不想让屠杀条约的触发放进堆叠,然后牌手响应施放抓牌咒语去掏一张阻抑,对吧?\\ ​ 最后,无论对手如何选择把异能放在什么时候,该异能会立刻结算而不使用堆叠。这是为了防止本应发生的触发被牌手响应。你肯定不想让屠杀条约的触发放进堆叠,然后牌手响应施放抓牌咒语去掏一张阻抑,对吧?\\ ​
 Notably, the opponent gets to choose the “when,” but not the “if.” One reason for this has to do with the fact that many zone-change triggers are, as pointed out above, utterly vital to the continued use of the associated objects. If an opponent got to choose whether these triggers happened at all, this infraction might be a little too harsh on players who, for example, suddenly find their Aetherling exiled forever just because they forgot to return it last turn. From the previous section: “Triggered abilities are common and invisible, so players should not be harshly penalized when forgetting about one.” So, policy has to have some special consideration here.\\ ​ Notably, the opponent gets to choose the “when,” but not the “if.” One reason for this has to do with the fact that many zone-change triggers are, as pointed out above, utterly vital to the continued use of the associated objects. If an opponent got to choose whether these triggers happened at all, this infraction might be a little too harsh on players who, for example, suddenly find their Aetherling exiled forever just because they forgot to return it last turn. From the previous section: “Triggered abilities are common and invisible, so players should not be harshly penalized when forgetting about one.” So, policy has to have some special consideration here.\\ ​
-注意,对手能选择的是“何时”而非“是否”放进堆叠。这样处理的一个原因是很多改变区域的触发式异能对于持续使用相关物件是至关重要的。如果对手可以选择这些触发是否发生,对于那些忘了上回合把乙太精怪移回场,结果发现乙太精怪因此被永远放逐的牌手而言,这个判罚会显得过重了。上一段中说:“触发式异能属于常见异能,且其机制较为隐蔽,因此不应在牌手忘记处理该类异能时即对其采取严厉的惩罚措施。”因此,方针不得不作出一些特殊的考虑。\\ ​+注意,对手能选择的是“何时”而非“是否”结算。这样处理的一个原因是很多改变区域的触发式异能对于持续使用相关物件是至关重要的。如果对手可以选择这些触发是否发生,对于那些忘了上回合把乙太精怪移回场,结果发现乙太精怪因此被永远放逐的牌手而言,这个判罚会显得过重了。上一段中说:“触发式异能属于常见异能,且其机制较为隐蔽,因此不应在牌手忘记处理该类异能时即对其采取严厉的惩罚措施。”因此,方针不得不作出一些特殊的考虑。\\ ​
 Also of interest is that even though these abilities don’t expire, players are still under no obligation to remind the opponent of their existence. A player is perfectly within policy by remaining quiet for several turns despite having noticed that his opponent’s Obzedat, Ghost Council never returned from exile. And don't forget the triggers on Pact of Negation and his buddies. The default action will be resolved even if it’s remembered two turns later.\\ ​ Also of interest is that even though these abilities don’t expire, players are still under no obligation to remind the opponent of their existence. A player is perfectly within policy by remaining quiet for several turns despite having noticed that his opponent’s Obzedat, Ghost Council never returned from exile. And don't forget the triggers on Pact of Negation and his buddies. The default action will be resolved even if it’s remembered two turns later.\\ ​
-有意思的是,即使这些异能的持续时限不会结束,牌手仍然没有义务提醒对手这些异能的存在。牌手对于对手的欧节达鬼影议会呆在放逐区好几个回合没回来保持沉默是完全符合方针的。逸散条约这类异能也是一样。即使在两个回合后才想起来,预设动作仍然会结算。\\ +++有意思的是,即使这些异能的持续时限不会结束,牌手仍然没有义务提醒对手这些异能的存在。牌手对于对手的欧节达鬼影议会呆在放逐区好几个回合没回来保持沉默是完全符合方针的。逸散条约这类异能也是一样。即使在两个回合后才想起来,预设动作仍然会结算。\\ ++\\  
 + 
 +**Abilities consisting of an action followed by “when you do” in the same ability are considered communicated by the announcement of the action. This is most commonly the case for exert and similar abilities.**
  
 **If the ability was missed prior to the current phase in the previous turn, instruct the players to continue playing. If the triggered ability created an effect whose duration has already expired, instruct the players to continue playing.**\\ ​ **If the ability was missed prior to the current phase in the previous turn, instruct the players to continue playing. If the triggered ability created an effect whose duration has already expired, instruct the players to continue playing.**\\ ​