差别

这里会显示出您选择的修订版和当前版本之间的差别。

--- ipg:1.2 [2017/07/03 19:01]
127.0.0.1 外部编辑
+++ ipg:1.2 [2018/01/10 16:15]
mtgjudge
@@ 行 1: / 行 1: @@
 [[:IPG:1.1|1.1. 各式处罚之定义]] | [[:IPG|返回IPG目录]] | [[:IPG:1.3|1.3. 随机化牌库]]
 ====== 1.2 Applying Penalties 应用处罚 ======
-**Penalties are included with the tournament report so that a permanent record can be kept in the DCI Penalty Database. Additionally, any penalty of Game Loss or higher should be reported to the Head Judge, and it is recommended that only the Head Judge issue penalties of this nature (with the exception of Tardiness (3.1) and Deck Errors (3.5)).**\\
+**Penalties are included with the tournament report so that a permanent record can be kept in the DCI Penalty Database. Additionally, any penalty of Game Loss or higher should be reported to the Head Judge, and it is recommended that only the Head Judge issue penalties of this nature (with the exception of Tardiness (3.1) and Decklist Problems (3.4)).**\\
 ++所有处罚都必须记录在比赛报告当中，以在DCI处罚数据库中留下永久记录。|\\
 Penalties need to be entered into the system. For both tracking within the event and for whatever purpose Wizards of the Coast uses them for once they go into the black hole. Mostly this sentence is just here as a gentle reminder to actually enter the penalties for the event into WER.\\
 所有判罚都需要录入到系统中。这样做的原因是为了持续记录牌手在比赛中的行为，以及为了威世智可能因故会使用这些信息。下面的这些话基本都是提醒你将你赛事中的判罚录入到WER中。\\ ++
-++此外，任何级别高于“一盘负”处罚（含“一盘负”）都必须回报给主审，并建议仅由主审来作这类的判罚（迟到（3.1）和套牌失误（3.5）此两项违规除外）。|\\
+++此外，任何级别高于“一盘负”处罚（含“一盘负”）都必须回报给主审，并建议仅由主审来作这类的判罚（迟到（3.1）和套牌登记表问题（3.4）此两项违规除外）。|\\
-Game Losses are a “big deal” and difficult to correct if they are issued by mistake. As a result, it is recommended that the Head Judge (HJ) be consulted prior to giving any Game Loss (GL) or Match Loss. As for Disqualifications, only the Head Judge can give those. The reason Tardiness and Deck Errors get an exception is because there is actually very little judgment involved in a Tardiness Game Loss (and they are extremely common), and the same holds true for Deck Errors. However, if the judge is on a team, it is recommended that they go through their Team Lead. At some events, the Head Judge may modify this policy. A common modification at Grand Prix events is that an Level 3 can issue game losses instead of having to consult the Head Judge. At Pro Tour Qualifiers or StarCityGames Open events it is not uncommon for Team Leaders to have the authority to issue Game Losses.\\
+Game Losses are a “big deal” and difficult to correct if they are issued by mistake. As a result, it is recommended that the Head Judge (HJ) be consulted prior to giving any Game Loss (GL) or Match Loss. As for Disqualifications, only the Head Judge can give those. The reason Tardiness and Decklist Problems get an exception is because there is actually very little judgment involved in a Tardiness Game Loss (and they are extremely common), and the same holds true for Decklist Problems. However, if the judge is on a team, it is recommended that they go through their Team Lead. At some events, the Head Judge may modify this policy. A common modification at Grand Prix events is that an Level 3 can issue game losses instead of having to consult the Head Judge. At Pro Tour Qualifiers or StarCityGames Open events it is not uncommon for Team Leaders to have the authority to issue Game Losses.\\
-一盘负是个比较大的判罚，而且如果判错了很难修正。所以我们建议你在给出一盘负或一局负之前请先去咨询主审。同时，只有主审能给出取消资格的判罚。迟到和套牌错误是两个例外，因为相对于其他一盘负的问题而言，判断这两个情况不需要很多信息，并且这些判罚也非常普遍。然而，如果裁判是成小组工作的，那么建议通过小组的组长来向主审反映。在某些比赛中，主审可以更改这条规定。常见的变更是在一场GP比赛中，L3裁判可以代替主审给出一盘负的判罚。在一些PTQ或SCG的比赛中，组长可以给一盘负的情况也并不少见。\\ ++
+一盘负是个比较大的判罚，而且如果判错了很难修正。所以我们建议你在给出一盘负或一局负之前请先去咨询主审。同时，只有主审能给出取消资格的判罚。迟到和套牌登记表问题是两个例外，因为相对于其他一盘负的问题而言，判断这两个情况不需要很多信息，并且这些判罚也非常普遍。然而，如果裁判是成小组工作的，那么建议通过小组的组长来向主审反映。在某些比赛中，主审可以更改这条规定。常见的变更是在一场GP比赛中，L3裁判可以代替主审给出一盘负的判罚。在一些PTQ或SCG的比赛中，组长可以给一盘负的情况也并不少见。\\ ++
 **Being enrolled in the tournament is not a requirement to receive a penalty. Although these guidelines refer to players, other people in the venue, such as spectators, staff, or judges may be enrolled into (and dropped from) the tournament in order to receive a penalty. Penalties are still issued even if a player drops from the tournament before it would take effect.**\\
@@ 行 35: / 行 35: @@
 裁判应该坚持依照方针进行修正。这些方针已经被充分的测试，除非出现极其罕见的边缘情形，它们可以应用于几乎所有的情况。如果你尝试用自己的方式去修复问题，你就冒了没有合适地修正、或者给一方过多的优势的风险。对于习惯了FNM的执法风格的裁判们更应该重视这个问题，因为一般级别在修正问题时给了裁判更多的“创造空间”。\\ ++
-**Infractions with the same root cause, or multiple instances of the same infraction that are discovered at the same time, are treated as a single infraction.**\\
+**If an error leads to multiple related infractions, only issue one with the most severe penalty.**\\
-++对于基础根据相同的违规，或是同时发现多次触犯了多次违规的情况，应视作一次违规进行处理。|\\
+++如果一个错误导致了多个相关联的违规，仅作出其中最严重的处罚。|\\
 This covers the case where judges come up to a table and find multiple errors. In many cases the errors are separate; like doing a deck check and finding marked cards and a 59 card deck. While those might both be found at the same time, they do not have the same root cause. However, sometimes multiple errors share the same root cause - such as players thinking heroic triggers off abilities, and repeatedly using equipment to trigger heroic. In that case, the root cause is the same, making it one infraction. If they did this three times, treat it as a single infraction for the purposes of fixing it and upgrades.\\
 这条适用于当裁判被叫到桌前时发现了许多问题的情况。有时这些问题是相互无关的。比如套牌检查时，一套牌里同时出现了59张牌和有记号的牌的问题。虽然这些问题被同时发现，但它们的起因不一样。然而，有时多个问题可能有着相同的起因。比如牌手认为勇行可以被异能触发，于是反复启动武具的佩戴异能来触发勇行。在此情况下，由于多个问题的起因是相同的，就应当把它们当做同一个违规来处理。即使该牌手这样做了三次，也当做是一次违规来处理、修正和升级。\\
 If the infractions are different infractions, yet have the same root cause, apply all appropriate fixes, despite giving the single infraction. Keep in mind that legally drawing a card off an illegally cast spell is **not** two infractions.\\
-如果这些违规是不同的违规，但具有相同的起因，进行所有适用的修正，但只给出一个判罚。记住因为不合法施放的咒语正确结算而抓了牌，并不算是两个违规。\\ ++
+如果这些违规是不同的违规，但具有相同的起因，进行所有适用的修正，但只给出一个判罚。记住因为不合法施放的咒语正确结算而抓了牌，并**不算是**两个违规。\\ ++
 <WRAP center round box 60%>
 [[:IPG:1.1|1.1. 各式处罚之定义]] | [[:IPG|返回IPG目录]] | [[:IPG:1.3|1.3. 随机化牌库]]

最近更新

用户

工具

差别